BMW X5 xDrive35i Review

"Dale Franks" (DaleFranks) 12/16/2015 at 18:48 • Filed to: None

0

11

In which I realize that !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! , if I hadn’t had a new Volvo XC90 to drive first.

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Dale Franks 12/16/2015 at 19:01

1

That car pictured in your article is not a 2016 X5; it is a 2013.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Dale Franks 12/16/2015 at 19:10

0

Also, the I6 is a 3.0 and the V8 is still a 4.4. The numbers of the model no longer correspond to liters.

Textured Soy Protein > Dale Franks 12/16/2015 at 19:14

1

Why do you have a bunch of pictures of the old E70 X5, when the current F15 X5 has been around since the 2014 model year?

E92M3 > Dale Franks 12/16/2015 at 19:17

0

What year X5 did you drive again? You said 2016, but the exterior photos are of the previous generation.

Dale Franks > E92M3 12/16/2015 at 19:32

0

Yes, I grabbed the wrong photos out of the photo dump. Fixed.

Dale Franks > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 12/16/2015 at 19:40

1

Sorry about that. Perils of writing late at night, I guess, and misreading the spec sheet. Or neglecting to read it fully. I was more concerned with the HP and Torque figures than the engine displacement.

E92M3 > Dale Franks 12/16/2015 at 19:41

0

I think I might prefer the E70 exterior, but I like the newer interior.

AM3R shamefully returns > E92M3 12/16/2015 at 19:46

1

That's pretty much how I feel, although I've always been a fan of the E70. Especially in M-sport trim

Dale Franks > Dale Franks 12/16/2015 at 19:50

1

I have acknowledged the errors and your corrections in the original post.

E92M3 > AM3R shamefully returns 12/16/2015 at 21:16

0

I like the M-Sport body pieces, but the wheels look just a hair too wide IMO

AM3R shamefully returns > E92M3 12/16/2015 at 22:26

0

I think the wheels look pretty cool, but I wouldn't want those if I were daily driving the X5. Too expensive and I'm sure the ride quality isn't that great on them.